{"id":4844,"date":"2021-07-14T08:00:39","date_gmt":"2021-07-14T12:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nacacadmitted.wpengine.com\/wordpress\/?p=4844"},"modified":"2021-07-13T22:16:00","modified_gmt":"2021-07-14T02:16:00","slug":"nacac-joins-push-to-remove-test-scores-from-college-rankings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/admitted.nacacnet.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/2021\/07\/14\/nacac-joins-push-to-remove-test-scores-from-college-rankings\/","title":{"rendered":"NACAC Joins Push to Remove Test Scores from College Rankings"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
iStock<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

NACAC joined several education organizations this week in calling for changes to the way college rankings are calculated by one of the nation\u2019s largest publishers of such information.<\/p>\n

The effort was organized by New America \u2014 a think tank based in Washington, DC \u2014 which published an open letter<\/a> to the editors of US News & World Report<\/em> asking them to end the practice of including the average SAT and ACT scores of incoming students in their Best Colleges<\/em> calculations.<\/p>\n

\u201cUsing average scores of incoming students to rank an institution has never made sense, but is even more preposterous during a deadly pandemic,\u201d notes the letter. \u201c\u2026At the same time, a rise in test-blind and test-optional admissions policies has made it difficult to compare institutions using this metric.\u201d<\/p>\n

The letter also points to research showing that, even in the best of years, the use of standardized test scores in calculating college rankings is problematic. Data shows that test scores can\u2019t reliably predict a student\u2019s performance in college. And overall, experts have found that the metric says more about an institution\u2019s admission practices than its quality of instruction.<\/p>\n

\u201cStandardized admissions tests benefit high-income and predominantly white students who can afford expensive tutoring\u2014teaching them tricks to taking the tests\u2014or to take the exams multiple times to improve their scores, while low-income students and students of color don\u2019t have access to the same resources,\u201d the letter notes. \u00a0\u201cAs a result, using test scores in selective college admissions disadvantages these students. Any organization that wishes to advance racial and socioeconomic equity in education should understand this. By using the test scores in the rankings, US News<\/em> is rewarding and helping perpetuate a gatekeeping tactic that is discriminatory.\u201d<\/p>\n

Learn more about college rankings<\/a>, read the full letter<\/a> from New America, and sign the petition<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Mary Stegmeir is a freelance writer and editor. She formerly served as NACAC\u2019s assistant director for editorial content and outreach.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

NACAC joined several education organizations this week in calling for changes to the way college rankings are calculated by one of the nation\u2019s largest publishers of such information. The effort was organized by New America \u2014 a think tank based in Washington, DC \u2014 which published an open letter to the editors of US News … Continue reading NACAC Joins Push to Remove Test Scores from College Rankings<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,18,14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4844","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-advocacy","category-rankings","category-standardized-testing"],"featured_image_src":null,"featured_image_src_square":null,"author_info":{"display_name":"Mary Stegmeir","author_link":"https:\/\/admitted.nacacnet.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/author\/mstegmeir\/"},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peWmJq-1g8","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/admitted.nacacnet.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4844","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/admitted.nacacnet.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/admitted.nacacnet.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admitted.nacacnet.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admitted.nacacnet.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4844"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/admitted.nacacnet.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4844\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/admitted.nacacnet.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4844"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admitted.nacacnet.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4844"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/admitted.nacacnet.org\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4844"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}